  |
Fixed-Income
Market Monitor Archive
|
| This article
is also available in a printable PDF format (see below).
|
September 2008
A Nightmare
On Wall Street |
- In the 1980's horror film, "A Nightmare on Elm Street," the
villain Freddy Krueger, terrorized people in their dreams. For the bond market,
this September could aptly be called "A Nightmare on Wall Street",
with the snowballing financial crisis playing the role of Freddy Krueger,
terrorizing market participants not only in their dreams, but also in their
waking moments. Indeed, panic seems to have taken over the bond market. It
could be argued that the darkest moment for the bond market occurred in the
early afternoon of September 17th. That was when the yield on the 3-month
T-bill was a mere 0.02%. (For the record, yes; T-bills can trade at negative
yields. Just pay a dollar price above par).
As professional investors we are supposed to remove the emotional aspect
from the process and proceed with a reasonable investment strategy. Buying
T-bills at 0.02% seems to be anything but a reasonable investment strategy.
To my way of thinking, investing at that level reflects extreme fear -- not
an unemotional, sound strategy. By putting money to "work" at
those levels you are basically saying that you could not find anything
better to invest in that will meet your needs. I touched on the demand
for risk free assets last month, but this is taking it to a whole new level -- one
that I have never seen before. Who were those buyers at 0.02%? My guess
is money market fund and cash managers who likely had very little choice.
I understand why some were forced to do so, but I would have a hard time
explaining it to clients that we manage money for. T-bill yields did bounce
back up a bit. Even though they did, if you have flexibility in your investment
portfolio, then I would recommend against investing in T-bills after this
recent flight to quality that has left their yields so low.
- Hank Paulson has become a financial paramedic in addition to his role
as Treasury Secretary. This current crisis is bad, but it could have been
worse. Paulson knows from his tenure on Wall Street the interconnectedness
of the credit markets and the banking system. In coming to the rescue of
several institutions he was able to "persuade" others to see
things from his point of view. The fact that the economic recovery package
(once known as the Troubled Asset Relief Act) did not pass on its first
vote by the House should not take away from the successes he has had. The
final chapter has not been written and there certainly were some big losses
and there may be even more to come, but the "saves" have been
even bigger.
The month of September provided a lifetime's worth of extreme
events. Fannie and Freddie received an official and explicit backstop from
the Treasury, Lehman filed for bankruptcy, Merrill "merged" with
BAC and AIG went from being on life support to resuscitation with the help
of $85B in loan guarantees. WaMu is gone and so too is Wachovia as we knew
it. I think we are fortunate that Paulson knew the importance of it all
and was able to get issues resolved as quickly as they were. Delays in
responding to many of these events would only have made matters worse.Today
we find much of the taxable bond market in a shambles. The financial sector
has been hit particularly hard and trading desks are reluctant (refusing?)
to take on any new inventory. The bid-side has fallen dramatically -- even
for higher quality financial institutions. Investors who can stomach the
startling headlines, and are capable of handling today's risks, now
have the opportunity to pick up some of the companies in this sector at
significant yield premiums. The risk, of course, is that no one knows who
the next Lehman or WaMu will be.
- The yields on tax-exempt municipal money market funds have recently
exploded to the upside. Because of their tax-exempt status, muni money
funds typically yield less than comparable taxable funds, but now many
yield twice as much as taxable funds! I reviewed the 7-day yields on 30
different funds (some national, some state specific) and came up with an
average yield of 5.07%. There are a couple of reasons for this, but mostly
it is just the latest chapter in the credit crunch. Money fund managers
want to have a greater amount of cash on hand to meet the demand for withdrawals.
A common investment for these funds is in a product called variable rate
demand notes (VRDN). VRDNs have rates that reset daily or weekly. A money
manager can sell his VRDN back to the remarketing agents who are obligated
to take the security back in for par value. (Many readers are now probably
thinking about the auction rate market mess, but these securities have
specific liquidity agreements in place where the ARS market did not). The
dealers, who have their own intense needs for cash, now have them on their
books and need to offer them at higher rates (sometimes at penalty rate
levels) to entice buyers. In the end it is not costing them for the higher
rates. It is costing the underlying issuers -- the municipalities
and agencies that issue the paper.
A couple of fund families have issued updates and information alerts
stating their commitment to the $1 NAV of their money market funds. We
believe them in their efforts to do so. These are extraordinary times though
and very little can be taken for granted. The added yields are appealing
and are sure to attract new assets. Investors who have cash on hand, and
have confidence in the fund families they are invested with, should take
advantage of these yields while they last because I don't think they'll
last too long.
- Market review:
- Other than T-bills and the Treasury index, every major fixed-income index
we follow was down in September. The TIPS index suffered its third worst
monthly drubbing in its 10-year history. Not since July of 2003 have TIPS
been hit as hard as they were. The dramatic sell-off in commodities has
contributed to an easing of inflation fears. One way this can be seen is
in a review of the break-even spreads between TIPS and nominal Treasuries.
It is at its narrowest in over five years.
- The benchmark 10-year Treasury note gained 0.18% during the month. The
year-to-date total return now stands at 4.42%. During the month the yield
ranged from a high of 3.85% to a low of 3.38%. There could be a lot of
supply on the horizon -- say perhaps $700B, just to grab a number
out of thin air. Demand certainly seems to be there now, so the market
should be able to absorb the new supply without too much disruption. I
do believe that this would be staggered into the market.
- The Lehman Aggregate Bond index's performance was dragged down by
its non-Treasury / non-government exposures. This index is broken down
into more than 100 parts and the worst performer was a decline of 17.1%
in long maturity issuers in the financial sector -- and these are
investment-grade rated!
- The High Yield index's monthly drop of 7.98% is the worst in its
25-year history. The yield-to-worst on this index now stands at 13.9%.
With a yield level like that it would not be surprising to see equity-like
returns from this asset class in the future. Yield spreads are at or approaching "distressed" levels -- levels
that are 1,000 basis points above Treasuries.
- As recently as the beginning of the year some market observers were discussing
the de-coupling theory of the Global economy, saying the U.S. could experience
a slowdown, but that other economies around the world may not. The Emerging
Market index's performance seems to be supporting the other side
of that argument.
-
The Municipal bond market as a whole performed poorly in September for
several reasons, but none of them seem as drastic as the problems that
plagued the corporate bond market. There are a couple of issues working
their way through the system now (a potential big default in Alabama and
one that already occurred in California). Not to diminish the severity
of these events, but the market has known about and prepared for these
occurrences. In my home state of Massachusetts, the State Treasurer was
on the airwaves discussing how difficult it is to borrow money (bring a
new bond deal) in this environment. This is not a unique situation as there
are reports of more than $10B in new deals being postponed to let the market
settle down and hopefully borrow later at more favorable rates. There is
a plus side to all of this for muni investors. Yield ratios (muni yields
as a percentage of Treasury yields) are at levels I have never seen before.
Investors can easily find yields of 5% + for high quality names in roughly
ten years or so until maturity. There is a growing opinion out there that
predicts that Federal taxes are going up. This could make tax-exempt munis
a much sought after investment.
| Lehman
Fixed Income Index Returns Through 9/30/08 |
| Lehman Index |
Duration |
Sep. |
YTD
'08 |
Ret. '07 |
Ret. '06 |
Ret. '.05 |
Ret. '04 |
| US T Bill Index |
0.32 |
0.29 |
% |
1.92 |
% |
5.01 |
% |
4.82 |
% |
3.05 |
% |
1.24 |
% |
| US Treasury Index |
5.20 |
0.61 |
|
4.58 |
|
9.01 |
|
3.08 |
|
2.79 |
|
3.54 |
|
| US TIPS Index |
4.21 |
-3.83 |
|
1.17 |
|
11.63 |
|
0.41 |
|
2.84 |
|
8.46 |
|
| US Aggregate Bond Index |
4.47 |
-1.34 |
|
0.63 |
|
6.97 |
|
4.33 |
|
2.43 |
|
4.34 |
|
| US Govt/Credit Index |
5.19 |
-2.53 |
|
-0.67 |
|
7.23 |
|
3.78 |
|
2.37 |
|
4.19 |
|
| US Credit Index {A2} |
5.88 |
-6.57 |
|
-6.83 |
|
5.11 |
|
4.26 |
|
1.96 |
|
5.24 |
|
| US High Yield Index {B1} |
4.42 |
-7.98 |
|
-10.08 |
|
1.87 |
|
11.85 |
|
2.74 |
|
11.13 |
|
| Caa Component |
4.26 |
-10.66 |
|
-14.78 |
|
-0.13 |
|
17.66 |
|
0.64 |
|
13.80 |
|
| Emerging Market ($$) {BA1} |
6.22 |
-6.87 |
|
-6.00 |
|
5.21 |
|
9.96 |
|
12.27 |
|
11.89 |
|
| Municipal Index |
8.07 |
-4.69 |
|
-3.19 |
|
3.36 |
|
4.84 |
|
3.51 |
|
4.48 |
|
| Municipal Index - 5 Year |
4.13 |
-2.06 |
|
1.78 |
|
5.15 |
|
3.34 |
|
0.95 |
|
2.72 |
|
Prepared by Christopher Keith Fixed Income Manager |

Christopher Keith
Fixed-Income Manager
|
Information contained in this release is for informational purposes only and has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable but is
considered an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any securities. The information, estimates and expressions of opinion herein
notice. Kobren Insight Management, Inc. is an investment advisor registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Upon request,
Kobren Insight Management’s Form ADV Part II, which describes, among other things, affiliations, services offered and fees charged. |
If you prefer, this
article is also available in a printable PDF format. The PDF will
open in a new window. You will need Adobe Reader to view this document
- click here to Download
Adobe Reader.

|
|