Saturday, February 4, 2012 

HomeFAQsContact Us

About Us

Our Investment Philosophy
Our Governing Principles
Our Investment Process
Our Professional Staff
Our Investment Programs
FAQs
Investment Insights
Commentary
Web Seminars
Analyst Spotlight

Analyst Spotlight Archive

Demystifying Emerging Market Bonds

Chris Keith

 

It wasn’t that long ago when the mere mention of emerging market bonds would send shivers down an investor’s spine. It was not at all unusual to view this whole asset class as toxic. Today, it is one of the hottest fixed-income investment areas. The fortunes of many investment sectors are cyclical and for the past few years, the cycle has been incredibly rewarding to investors in emerging-market bonds. Will this once peripheral asset class continue to be a nice addition to an investor’s portfolio or are they destined to become a poison once again.

Exactly What Are Emerging Market Bonds?
Emerging market bonds are the sovereign (government) debt of emerging market countries – like Treasury bonds are here in the U.S. So what makes a country an “emerging market?”

The International Monetary Fund (the IMF) originally introduced the phrase “emerging market economy” in the early 1980s to describe an economy with low per capita income. Mohamed El-Erian, who worked at the IMF, and now heads the emerging markets group for PIMCO and manages their emerging market debt fund, describes an emerging market economy as one with less than $10,000 in annual per capita income.

The “emerging” part comes from the fact that these economies are in the process of becoming more open and transparent to the rest of the world. The motivation for this transformation is to attract the foreign capital investment needed to foster their economic advancement.

Because these economies are less mature and less stable than our own, emerging market bonds typically trade with a (yield) “spread” relative to U.S. Treasury bonds. That is to say that investors demand a higher yield (or yield premium) over Treasuries for investing in any debt that has more perceived risk. The greater the perceived additional risk, the greater (wider) the spread between the yield on that debt and treasuries.

Favorable Winds Have Been Blowing
The spread between any bond and treasuries will widen or tighten as events unfold that affect the “health” of the bond’s issuer. Over the past few years, several factors have combined to narrow the spread versus Treasuries significantly (see chart below).

Emerging Market Debt Chart

Because these economies are emerging, their potential for growth is greater than more mature countries. And historically low global interest rates, such as we have seen in recent years, provide the ideal environment for emerging market countries to realize their greater growth potential. First and most obvious, low rates allow them to finance their growth more cheaply. But in addition, low rates around the world make the extra yield available on emerging market bonds very attractive to yield-hungry investors therefore making it easier for emerging market countries to get access to credit.Indeed, the growth rates of emerging market countries have far outpaced those in the developed world over the past several years. For example, Russia's economy surged 6% last year, marking six straight years of better than 4% growth. While the U.S. has been racking up deficits, Russia actually became a creditor nation by the end of 2004. They have been buying U.S. Treasuries!

Russia, like a number of other emerging market countries, is an oil exporter and the surging price of oil has been yet another boost to their fortunes. Over the past five years, the average price of oil was $31 a barrel. Over the past five months, a barrel of oil has averaged $48 and currently is above $55.

This robust economic health has resulted in a slew of credit upgrades by the major rating services. Moody's Investors Service has announced 50 sovereign upgrades since the beginning of 2002 and only 17 downgrades. And when a bond’s credit rating is upgraded, the perceived risk is less, which narrows the spread.

Further contributing to the narrowing in spreads has been the decline in the U.S. dollar. A falling dollar makes the interest earned (and any capital appreciation as well) on a foreign bond worth more to U.S. investors, reducing the effective yield premium needed.

This narrowing of the yield spread has translated into strong returns for emerging market debt (bond prices move in the opposite direction of yields). The Lehman Brothers U.S. Dollar Denominated Emerging Market Bond Index hasn’t had a down year since 1998 (see table below). From 1999, when the current winning streak began, through 2004, the index is up 126% compared to a 43.7% return for the investment grade Lehman Aggregate Bond Index (a broad measure of both government and corporate bonds in the U.S.) and just 7.8% for the S&P 500.

 

Lehman Emerging Mrkt Bond Index Performance (YTD 3/17/05)
1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
Emerging Market Bonds -13.7 23.2 28.3 13.2 -11.6 23.1
General U.S. Bond Mkt -2.9 18.5 3.6 9.7 8.7 -0.8
S&P 500 1.3 37.6 23.0 33.4 28.6 21.0
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Emerging Market Bonds 13.7 1.4 12.3 26.9 11.9 0.4
General U.S. Bond Mkt 11.6 8.4 10.3 4.1 4.3 -0.3
S&P 500 -9.1 -11.9 -22.1 28.7 10.9 -1.3

Recent History Masks True Risk Picture
Despite their strong returns and improving fortunes, don’t be lulled into a false sense of security when it comes to emerging market bonds -- these are still risky securities.

While narrowing spreads over the past several years have rewarded investors with higher prices, the flip side is that, going forward, you are now getting a lot less “protection” (in the form of a higher yield) in case something goes wrong.

And things do go wrong. Argentina recently defaulted on some $100 billion of their debt. The Argentine Central Bank is coordinating a “debt swap” that will pay holders of those bonds just 25¢ on the dollar.

While Russia is the “poster boy” for emerging market health today – six years ago it was in default!

Even though there have been big improvements in the quality of emerging market debt (Russia and several other countries are now actually rated as investment grade or “BBB”) the average rating of the bonds in the Lehman emerging market bond index is “B-” or speculative grade.

A Watchful Outlook
So far this year (through March 17) emerging market bonds are still outpacing general U.S. bonds and stocks.

However, while the favorable winds that have been at the backs of emerging markets may still be blowing, the wind speed is decreasing. In fact, after a strong start, emerging market bonds have given back almost all of their gains (largely on fears of higher interest rates - more on that below) and are now up just 0.4% for the year.

Oil prices are likely to remain high -- particularly relative to five years ago – and will continue to be beneficial to oil exporters with the emerging markets. But we are unlikely to see a similar sharp run up over the next five years.

Even without the salutary effects of higher oil prices, emerging markets still offer the best growth prospects. And the relatively low yield world we are in is likely to persist at least relative to historical norms. Yield-hungry investors have few options to turn to as more traditional fixed income areas have only a limited amount of appeal.

The risk to all this is that interest rates rise faster and farther than expected. The flip side of the oil boom is the potential for increased inflation. So far inflation remains muted and the Federal Reserve has modestly increased short-term rates without any impact on longer term rates. However, the more traditional relationship is for long rates to increase along with short rates. The Fed has made it clear they expect to continue increasing short rates; it is less clear that long rates will continue to be unaffected.

The dollar’s effect on emerging market debt is similarly a bit muddy. While longer-term forces (primarily our budget and trade deficits) would seem to favor a continuation of a decline in the dollar’s value, the short-term could see a stronger greenback. So far this year the dollar has strengthened a bit versus most major currencies.

In addition, as we noted earlier, investment sector returns are cyclical, and the fact that emerging market bonds have been on such an extended roll should at the very least make investors watchful for signs of trouble. In 1998, the year before their current streak began, emerging market bonds (as measured by the Lehman index) fell 11.6% compared to a gain of 8.7% for the Lehman Aggregate and 28.6% for the S&P 500.

In summary, recent stellar returns in emerging market bond funds are not likely to be duplicated, but they still look attractive relative to alternative fixed income asset classes. However, the margin of safety is now much less and investors should not forget the risks that these securities entail.

Our Exposure To Emerging Market Bonds
Currently we do not have a dedicated exposure to emerging market debt in our portfolios through a “pure” emerging market bond fund. However, we do have indirect exposure to this area in some of our portfolios through multi-sector funds that invest a portion of their assets in emerging market bonds, such as Loomis Sayles Bond, Fidelity Strategic Income and PIMCO All Asset. These funds offer a “smoother ride” than a pure emerging markets fund, thanks to their diversification across several sectors. In addition, we also benefit from the experience and skill of these outstanding managers who can adjust their exposure to emerging markets depending on their evaluation of the relative risks and rewards. bullet><br>
  </p>
</div>
  </td></tr>
	        </table>

             <tr>
                <td valign=




   PRIVACY POLICY    HOME    TERMS & CONDITIONS

©2012 Kobren Insight Management - An Adviser Investments Company